Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Wilson v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00439
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick C. Thaler
Petitioner:
Keith Andre Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. BANKS et al
as 2:2010cv01884
Petitioner:
ANDRE WILSON
Respondent:
TERERSER A. BANKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00292
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick C. Thaler
Petitioner:
Keith Andre Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 09-10394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Steven K. Wilson, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 09-10330
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Steven K. Wilson, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson
Movant - Appellant:
RICHARD A. GRAY, Jr., GRAY INVESTMENT PARTNERS and CUMBERLAND HILL CAPITAL FUND, LP
Wilson v. TDCJ-ID
as 4:2009cv02501
Plaintiff:
Keith Andre Wilson
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2009cv00352
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WILSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wilson v. Texas Department Criminal Justice
as 4:2009cv00213
Plaintiff:
Keith Andre Wilson
Defendant:
Texas Department Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RILEY et al v. PUPICH et al
as 2:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
TORRI RILEY and ANDRE WILSON
Defendant:
CHARLES PUPICH, CHARLES PUPICH and RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Graham et al
as 1:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Andre' Wilson
Defendant:
Delmos Graham, Richard Stasny, Steven Hyre and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
