Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Stubblefield v. Garcia et al
as 3:2010cv02405
Plaintiff:
Antoine Stubblefield
Defendant:
G Garcia, A Andujar and C Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BARNES v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2010cv78961
Plaintiff:
LARRY C BARNES
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larry C. Barnes, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as GAS/5:10-CV-00053
Plaintiff:
Larry C. Barnes, etc.
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Barnes v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Larry C. Barnes
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Davis v. Price et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Richard L Davis
Defendant:
Jerry L Price, M Heckman, David E Lain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubblefield v. Garcia et al
as 3:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Antoine Stubblefield
Defendant:
G Garcia, A Andujar and C Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jelitha McKenney v. Lance Harrison, et al
as 10-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jelitha McKenney, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of James C. Barnes, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
Lance Harrison, Officer, individually and in their respective capacities as officers of the Omaha, Nebraska Police Department, Dawn Pollreis, Officer, individually and in their respective capacities as officers of the Omaha, Nebraska Police Department and City of Omaha, Nebraska
-RBB Armstrong v. Scribner
as 3:2006cv00852
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BARNES
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. SCARPINE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
