Cases 71 - 80 of 2,462
Walker v. Officer Chan et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Defendant:
Lt. Daily and Officer Chan
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gu v. Chen et al
as 1:2024cv04612
Defendant:
252685 ST LLC, RE/MAX Real Estate Professionals, Erik Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chan et al v. Sienna Marketing and Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04071
Defendant:
ProVenture Capital, LLC, Sienna Marketing and Consulting, Inc. doing business as Creative Capital Solutions, City Capital NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sysonic Electronics, Inc. and Shihwen Simon Chan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chan et al v.Val-Chris Investments, Inc
as 3:2024cv02764
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Nagy Chan and David Chan
Defendant:
Val-Chris Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Chan et al v. Stefanski et al
as 3:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Amanda Jones, Gabriel Chan, Stefan Ascierto and others
Defendant:
Robert Sinnott, City of San Rafael and John Stefanski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes v. JJ Chan's Garden Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03861
Defendant:
JJ Chan's Garden Inc. and Jessica Ly Kong
Plaintiff:
Alberto Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/24
as 3:2024mc80145
Unknown:
Krishna Kumar Yerur, Ferdinand Carbonell Malimban, Teodoro Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chan v. Equinix, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Wayne Chan
Defendant:
Equinix, Inc., Charles Meyers and Keith D. Taylor
Bowman v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis and Christopher Ahlers
Plaintiff:
Hywel Channing Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
