Cases 71 - 80 of 488
Jean-Gabriel Bernier v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jean-Gabriel Bernier
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Shorter v. Samuels et al
as 3:2016cv01973
Plaintiff:
Janice Shorter
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joseph L. Norwood, Robert Kaszuba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Karen Ripple, et al
as 16-5272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Ripple, Fed. Probation Ofc., Intake Counsel, D.C. Bar Assn., Supervisor, Fed. Probation Office and others
Carlton Spady v. Charles Samuel, Jr.
as 16-7181
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLTON R. SPADY
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUEL, JR., Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Stine v. Samuel
as 16-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Renee Bumb, et al
as 16-3404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE M. BUMB, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Spady v. Samuel, Jr.
as 1:2016cv00968
Petitioner:
Carlton R. Spady
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-5209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joe Norwood, J. Hollingsworth and others
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv23044
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons , J Hollingsworth, Dynan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
