Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Susan Matousek v. City of Norfolk
as 19-1179
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK and NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK
Matousek v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2018cv00609
Defendant:
Norfolk Police Dept. and City of Norfolk
Plaintiff:
Susan N. Matousek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wright v. City of Norfolk
as 2:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Carl Kent Wright
Defendant:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc. v. City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron et al
as 2:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron, City of Portsmouth Sheriff Michael A. Moore and City of Chesapeake Sheriff Jim O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toole v. City of Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney
as 2:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Bridget Toole
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Small v. Tate et al
as 2:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Small
Defendant:
C. M. Tate , E. A. Ortiz , J. Natiello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Appomattox River Water Authority et al v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv08159
Plaintiff:
Appomattox River Water Authority , County of Chesterfield , County Of Henrico and others
Defendant:
GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC, GENERAL CHEMICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terrell Joyner v. Karen Burrell
as 18-6369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL ROSHAD JOYNER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN JEAN BURRELL, Judge, City of Norfolk, VA, MAGISTRATE, City of Norfolk, VA and EVERETT ARMSTRONG MARTIN, JR., Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
