Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Rupert v. Poe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00194
Plaintiff: Prentis Rupert
Defendant: Chris Poe, David Kelly, Jonesboro Arkansas, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaway Bank & Trust Company et al v. Johnson
as 1:2011cv04571
Defendant: Torris Johnson
Plaintiff: Seaway Bank & Trust Company , Seaway Bancshares, Inc., Richard Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Nathson Fields v. Lawrence Wharrie, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2035
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATHSON FIELDS
Defendant - Appellant: LAWRENCE WHARRIE and DAVID KELLY
David Kelly v. T. Felker
as 11-55255
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID KELLY
Respondent - Appellee: T. FELKER, Warden
Banks v. Kelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00010
Plaintiff: Theodore C Banks
Defendant: David Kelly, Tony Viator, Phillip Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05664
Plaintiff: Kaliph Daley
Defendant: City of New York, Abram Maldanado, David Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fields v. City of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01168
Plaintiff: Nathson E. Fields
Defendant: City of Chicago, County of Cook, Office of Cook County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewster v. McNeil
as 2:2009cv14308
Plaintiff: David Kelly Brewster
Defendant: Walter A. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Kelly v. Larry Norris
as 09-2181
Petitioner - Appellant: David Kelly
Respondent - Appellee: Larry Norris, Director of Arkansas Department of Corrections
Frank Ortiz v. David Kelly, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15918
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID KELLY, LOYDE COBB, ADAM ENDEL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?