Cases 71 - 80 of 301
Daniel Johnson et al v. City of Hesperia et al
as 5:2021cv00383
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, County of San Bernardino, Larry Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Johnson and Lisa Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06278
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYCE DANIEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00500
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daigle v. United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00177
Defendant:
Danielle Johnson, Tien D Nguyen and United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nancy Daigle
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Nancy Daigle v. United Wholesale Mortgage LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Danielle Johnson, Tien D Nguyen, United Wholesale Mortgage LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Daigle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11611
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04663
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS v. GANT et al
as 2:2020cv00410
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, ADAM LOUDERMILK and JUSTIN GANT
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RUDOLPH ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GRANT et al
as 2:2020cv00389
Defendant:
CODY TIDD, GRANT, TRAVIS CLEMENTS and others
Plaintiff:
BARNARD L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callicotte v. Sneed et al
as 4:2020cv02492
Plaintiff:
Jason Colby Callicotte
Defendant:
Cedric Price, Shawn Stepney Garry, Quinton Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
