Cases 71 - 80 of 1,961
Heyward v. Dinkins et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
L. M. Heyward
Defendant:
Veronica Dinkins, K. Plank, R Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Northfield Insurance Company v. JVA DeIcing, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Northfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
JVA DeIcing, Inc., Joseph Tuzze, Cargill, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Donahue et al
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Chen Lee
Defendant:
Brock Kevin Donahue and PV Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DONAHUE v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA
as 2:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
PAUL DONAHUE
Defendant:
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Garner v. Crescent Bank & Trust (Louisiana) et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Kelly Renee' Garner
Defendant:
Crescent Bank & Trust (Louisiana), Brian Donahue and Stephen Notarianni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DONAHUE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DONAHUE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DONAHUE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03184
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DONAHUE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker v. Donahue
as 1:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Dwayne Tucker
Respondent:
James Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Custer v. Kevin Lyons, et al
as 23-1150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CUSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN LYONS, JODI M. HOOS, D.A. SHELLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
