Cases 71 - 80 of 1,746
Smith v. Baker et al
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Judge Nina Markette Baker, City of LaGrange, The LaGrange Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Symphony Care Networks et al
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Symphony Care Networks, Symphony of Morgan Park and Nicole Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Althouse v. USA
as 23-10282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin R. Althouse, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Mentally Disabled and or Special Needs Offenders
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of Texas, County of Dallas, Texas and others
Davis v. Preston E. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Preston E. Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 23-1438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others
Smith, Jr. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv17792
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco, S.A. de C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
