Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Holmes v. Estock et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02458
Plaintiff: Charles Holmes
Defendant: Estock, Bal, S. Chaiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estock v. USA
as 3:2016cv01587
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Garrett Estock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brandon v. Carmichael et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02814
Plaintiff: Vincent Brandon
Defendant: L. Carmichael, Erika Estock, David Hjerpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Jay v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 15-3148
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH JAY
Defendant - Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SHIRLEY SMEAL, Executive Deputy Secretary of PA. DOC, DAN CARO, Staff Assistant (Western Region) and others
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01024
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAY
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala v. Stepke et al
as 3:2015cv01425
Plaintiff: Jonathan Ayala
Defendant: Stepke, Estock, Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ProBuilders Specialty Insurance Company RRG v. Rusert Homes LLC et al
as 6:2014cv01923
Plaintiff: ProBuilders Specialty Insurance Company RRG
Defendant: Rusert Homes LLC, Robert Estock and Jeffrey Michael Rusert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Ramey et al v. Estock
as 4:2014cv00065
Plaintiff: Dale Ramey , Christina Ramey and A.R. Ramey
Defendant: John F Estock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Hodge v. Colombini, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-56323
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK HODGE
Defendant - Appellee: COLOMBINI, M.D., ESTOCK, M.D., J. ZAMORA, R.N. and others
Dennis Martel v. E. Estock, et al
as 14-55520
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS MARTEL
Defendant - Appellee: E. ESTOCK, Primary Care Provider and K. BALL, Chief Medical Officer

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?