Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Valdez v. AU Optronics Corp.
as 2:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Valdez
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp. America, AU Optronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Beall v. Au Optronics Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv02165
Plaintiff:
Scott Beall
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp., Au Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Northway v AU Optronics Corp., et al
as 4:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
Benjamin G Northway
Defendant:
Au Optronics, Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ralik v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv01272
Plaintiff:
Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Intervenor:
Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ralik v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 4:2007cv01272
Plaintiff:
Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Stern v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shawn Stern, Shawn Stern, Shawn Stern and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Rywelski v. AU Optronics Corp, et al
as 0:2007cv01393
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp, AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FESER v. AU OPTRONICS CORP. et al
as 1:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
GAIL FESER
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORP., AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA, CHI MEIOPTO ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Carrillo v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv01179
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Carrillo
Defendant:
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
