Cases 71 - 80 of 235
Claudio v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00955
Plaintiff:
Luis Claudio
Defendant:
Lieutenant Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babulsky v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
James Babulsky
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TeekaSingh v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
Osbert TeekaSingh
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. SSA
as 7:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Renfro et al v. J.G. Boswell Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Christopher Renfro and Sima Edsell
Defendant:
J.G. Boswell Co. Inc., J.G. Boswell Tomato Co. Kern, J.G. Boswell Tomato Co Kings and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Solorio v. People, et al.
as 1:2016cv01829
Plaintiff:
Anselmo Solorio
Defendant:
People, Trump, Hiliary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. GZPLINSKI et al
as 1:2016cv08181
Plaintiff:
WARDELL HARVEY
Defendant:
PETE GZPLINSKI , CHRISTOPHER PUEF , CHARLES SUPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Johnson, et al v. Commission on Presidential De, et al
as 16-7107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary E. Johnson, Gary Johnson 2012, Inc., Libertarian National Committee, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Commission on Presidential Debates, Republican National Committee, Democratic National Committee and others
Dwyer et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00697
Plaintiff:
Michael Dwyer , Dan Tibbs , Brathel McNeil and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fulcher v. Crew et al
as 1:2016cv02437
Defendant:
Donovan Allen, Brian Clarke, Rudolph F. Crew and others
Plaintiff:
William Fulcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
