Cases 71 - 80 of 417
CARABALLO v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04941
Plaintiff:
GENESIS CARABALLO
Defendant:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED HEALTH CARE and OXFORD HEALTH PLANS (NJ), INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
In Re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
as 2:2013cv20000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs' Counsel, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Judy Sheridan and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., BCBSM, Inc.,, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and others
Special Master:
Special Master
In Re:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation MDL 2406
Respondent:
Baycare Health System, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY et al v. SPEECH & LANGUAGE CENTER, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
AETNA HEALTH CARE INC, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
SPEECH & LANGUAGE CENTER, LLC, CHRYSSOULA MARINOS-ARSESNIS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10493
Plaintiff:
Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. doing business as Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
CHAMPEY PAIN GROUP v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES
as 2:2021cv17815
Plaintiff:
CHAMPEY PAIN GROUP, MINE HILL SURGICAL CENTER and MINE HILL ANESTHESIA GROUP
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES doing business as HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MODERN ORTHOPAEDICS OF NEW JERSEY v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2021cv20174
Plaintiff:
MODERN ORTHOPAEDICS OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. doing business as HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
