Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03340
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mintz v. Macy's Retail Holdings Inc
as 4:2015cv03232
Plaintiff: Libby Mintz
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Riddick v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03690
Plaintiff: Judia Riddick
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and John Doe Contractor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rafferty v. Rafferty et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv01543
Plaintiff: Jeanne U. Rafferty
Defendant: Kathe Rafferty , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Cross_claimant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cross_defendant: Kathe Rafferty
Counter_claimant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant: Jeanne U. Rafferty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02743
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dana Ruth Lixenburg v. Bioworld Merchandising Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv07242
Defendant: Bioworld Merchandising Inc, Does, Forever 21 Inc and others
Plaintiff: Dana Ruth Lixenburg
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00257
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Forney v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2015cv02484
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wanda Forney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01588
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?