Cases 71 - 80 of 259
Olive v. Poshmark, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07337
Plaintiff:
Tara Olive
Defendant:
Poshmark, Inc., Manish Chandra, Navin Chaddha and others
O'Dell v. Poshmark, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09779
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Poshmark, Inc., Manish Chandra, Navin Chaddha and others
Carlisle v. Shift Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09732
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Shift Technologies, Inc., George Arison, Toby Russell and others
Mohammed v. Durbin et al
as 1:2022cv06282
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Senator Dick Durbin, Senator Tammy Duckworth, U.S. Attorney John R. Lausch Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05937
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Clerk Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Aggarwal v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
as 22-1718
Petitioner:
SUNIL AGGARWAL, MD, PHD, FAAPMR, FAAHPM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Amicus Curiae:
END OF LIFE WASHINGTON, EVERGREENHEALTH, A SACRED PASSING and others
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05786
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
