Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Perritt v. J. Reuben Long Detention Ctr. et al
as 0:2019cv01881
Plaintiff:
Micheal Wayne Perritt and Michael Wayne Perritt
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Ctr., Mediko, Heather Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Griffith v. Mediko et al
as 7:2019cv00269
Defendant:
Dr. Jane Dicocco, Dr. Hurlburt, Mediko and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kelly Griffith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunley v. Mediko Medical Co.
as 7:2018cv00397
Defendant:
Mediko Medical Co.
Plaintiff:
Brian Turner Nunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenbaum v. Mediko et al
as 9:2018cv01666
Plaintiff:
James Rosenbaum
Defendant:
Mediko, Joseph Papotto, Missy Vanduser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cubbage v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Cubbage
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Robert Williams, James Wodford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fullwood v. J. Reuben Long et al
as 4:2018cv00883
Plaintiff:
Shamar Fullwood
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long and Mediko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fullwood v. J. Reuben Long et al
as 4:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
Shamar Fullwood
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long and Mediko/Medico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hucks v. J Reuben Long Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00852
Plaintiff:
Ernest Bradford Hucks
Defendant:
J Reuben Long Detention Center, Mediko and Missy Van Duser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. Clark et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lyndell Yates
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Dr. Gujral, Dr. Negash Tesemma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Awan Hardy v. Booker
as 16-7571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AWAN HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOOKER, Officer, City of Fredericksburg, TONEY, Officer, City of Farmville and ARIES, Officer, City of Farmville
Defendant:
PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, MEDIKO, P.C., Piedmont Regional Jail and DONALD HUNTER, City of Farmville
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
