Cases 71 - 80 of 229
Riley Johannessohn, et al v. Polaris Industries Inc.
as 20-8005
Petitioner:
Kevin R. Wonders, James Kelley, Daniel C. Badilla and others
Respondent:
Polaris Industries Inc.
OTTILIO v. MOTORCYCLE MALL, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv01572
Plaintiff:
VICTOR OTTILIO
Defendant:
MOTORCYCLE MALL, INC. and POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Mustin et al v. Polaris Industries Inc et al
as 5:2019cv01982
Plaintiff:
Shaquawn Mustin and Sheleah McDonald
Defendant:
James McKinley, Jr and Polaris Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kreher v. Polaris Industries, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc., A Washington Corporation, Sydenstricker Nobbe Partners and Polaris Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruben Kreher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 0:2018cv00939
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc. and Polaris Sales Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Zeeck, Ed Beattie, James Bruner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Polaris Industries, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00379
Plaintiff:
Adam Jackson
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Inc.
as 19-2390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCTIC CAT INC. and ARCTIC CAT SALES, INC.
Reis et al v. Polaris Industries, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02481
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lamb and Chad Reis
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Guzman et al v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01543
Defendant:
Polaris Sales, Inc., Polaris Industries, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Paul Guzman and Jeremy Albright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Inc.
as 19-2446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
ARCTIC CAT SALES, INC. and ARCTIC CAT INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
