Cases 71 - 80 of 578
PONDER v. WARDEN ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv19986
Plaintiff:
ERIC PONDER
Defendant:
WARDEN ORTIZ, OFFICER A. DILLON and OFFICER FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. Collier et al
as 1:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jerald Anthony Hall
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Aaron J Tompkins, Kevin L Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PONDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62523
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PONDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Trooper Tyler S. Ross, Senior Trooper John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US Airline Services, LLC et al v. Electronic Commerce, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
US Airline Services, LLC and Mitesh Ramani
Defendant:
Electronic Commerce, LLC, Commercial Bank of California, Does 1-50, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ponder v. Maaranu et al
as 1:2021cv01239
Plaintiff:
Darnell Ponder
Defendant:
Khaazra Maaranu
Nominal Defendant:
Electronic Commerce LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PONDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43147
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHARLES PONDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PONDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39844
Plaintiff:
JAMALL PONDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Ponder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 21-12761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN LAMAR PONDER
Defendant / Appellee:
EXPERIAN
RICHARDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36437
Plaintiff:
PONDER FONTAINE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
