Cases 71 - 80 of 684
Frazier v. Raleigh Concrete, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Clifford Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Raleigh Concrete, LLC and Fortress Cement, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McKinney v. Davis et al
as 5:2022ct03051
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dejuan McKinney
Defendant:
Dustin Davis, Winnfield City Police Dept., Johnny Ray Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
James A. Ray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hodge v. Wake County Justice Center et al
as 5:2021ct03326
Plaintiff:
Ray Antonio Hodge
Defendant:
Wake County Justice Center and Wake County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Wake County Detention Center
as 5:2021ct03306
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Defendant:
Wake County Detention Center, Officials in Charge of Public Safety of North Carolina Parole Division, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. USA
as 4:2021cv00142
Petitioner:
Nikita Ray Coleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arnold v. Slagle
as 5:2021cv00140
Petitioner:
James Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughan v. Romm et al
as 2:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Susan W. Vaughan
Defendant:
Kathlyn S. Romm, Ray Matusko, Courtney Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Robinson et al v. McDowell County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Robinson, James Julius Lumpkin, David Kenneth Fowler and others
Defendant:
McDowell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. County of Onslow et al
as 5:2021ct03278
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ray
Defendant:
County of Onslow, Detective John Getty and Judge Kent Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
