Cases 71 - 80 of 552
Renfro v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Collyn Renfro
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Donald Renfro, III v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00725
Petitioner:
Donald Renfro, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Renfro v. People of the State of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00230
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Renfro
Respondent:
People of the State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Renfro v. People Of The State Of KY et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Renfro
Defendant:
People Of The State Of KY, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro v. Robey
as 3:2022cv00190
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Renfro
Defendant:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RENFRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04539
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RANDALL RENFRO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Hohm Tech, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
David Cunningham
Defendant:
Hohm Tech, Inc., Becara LLC d/b/a "Hohm Tech", John Renfro Supply, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RENFROE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68602
Plaintiff:
DAVID RENFROE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Renfroe v. USAA
as 4:2021cv01649
Plaintiff:
Martin D Renfroe
Defendant:
USAA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
