Cases 71 - 80 of 311
Journey v. Nebraska Mental Health Board et al
as 8:2019cv00089
Respondent:
Buffalo County Mental Health Board, Agnes Stairs, Stephen Lowe and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General and Buffalo County Attorney
Petitioner:
Ricky G. Journey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atwood v. Durrani
as 8:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Atwood
Interested Party:
Richard Azizkhan and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani
McCoy v. Johnson et al
as 8:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ryan McCoy
Defendant:
Tisha M. Deming and Richard L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Journey v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Nebraska Mental Health Board, Cathy Sheair, Richard Beecher and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Journey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epp v. Natural Resources Conservation Service et al
as 4:2018cv03166
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue and Natural Resources Conservation Service
Plaintiff:
Richard Epp
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1631
Johnson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
as 4:2018cv03136
Petitioner:
Mr. Richard Johnson and Richard Johnson
Respondent:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Harshbarger et al v. Neon Garden Valley MHP LLC.
as 8:2018cv00425
Plaintiff:
Richard Harshbarger and Teresa Harshbarger
Defendant:
Neon Garden Valley MHP LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garza v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00393
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Richard Rolando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Polak v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2018cv00358
Defendant:
Clinton Gormley, John Does 1-100, City of Omaha and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Polak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
