Cases 71 - 80 of 7,392
Block v. Boncher, et al
as 24-1530
Defendant:
GREG BRESLIN, in his official capacity as Acting Warden at FTC Oklahoma, DR. LUND, acting Medical Care Provider for petitioner at FMC Devens, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
WAYLEN BLOCK
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-8022
Petitioner:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, COLETTE S. PETERS, STEVE KALLIS, Warden and others
Chavez v. Hijar
as 24-50427
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar, Warden, FCI La Tuna, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Encarnacion-Lafontaine v. Warden
as 24-1971
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WARDEN, WARDEN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
EDGAR ENCARNACION-LAFONTAINE
California Coalition for Women Prisoners, et al. v. Bellhouse, et al.
as 24-4509
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, JOHN RUSSELL BELLHOUSE, THAHESHA JUSINO, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
S.I., A.S., G.M. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
N. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv04273
Plaintiff:
L. N.
Defendant:
Smtih, United States Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Abordo v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Detention Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Abordo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.W. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv04290
Defendant:
Darrell Wayne Smith, Ray J. Garcia, Patrick Pool and others
Plaintiff:
J.W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
