Cases 71 - 80 of 116
Woods v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 6:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
Thomas Woods
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Woods v. Patton
as 4:2014cv00329
Petitioner:
William Thomas Woods
Respondent:
Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ramos v. Wood et al
as 1:2013cv06142
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramos
Defendant:
Thomas Wood, Carlos Lozada and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05902
Plaintiff:
Raul Williams
Defendant:
City of New York , Thomas Woods, Kevin Mazza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13461
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Woods and Thomas Woods
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Woods et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13461
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Woods and Thomas Woods
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. The City of New York
as 13-1402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ted Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, Anthony Rosado, Police Officer, Thomas Woods, Police Officer and others
Johnson v. The City of New York
as 13-1103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ted Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, Anthony Rosado, Police Officer, Thomas Woods, Police Officer and others
Shirley Thomas, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
as 13-80044
Plaintiff - Respondent:
SHIRLEY THOMAS, a single individual, BARBARA MCKISKI, individually and as next of kin to Kenneth Mckiski, deceased, ANGEL MCMILLIAN, individually and as next of kin to Terry L McMillian, deceased and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
