Cases 71 - 80 of 613
James River Insurance Company v. Curbstand, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06281
Plaintiff:
James River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Curbstand, Inc., Edgardo De los Santos Macias and Shad Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lester v. Whitten
as 6:2022cv00241
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Lester
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00307
Petitioner:
Glendell Dewayne Lee
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Whitten et al
as 6:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Lester
Defendant:
Rick Whitten, Ms. V Howes, Mrs. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYBRID PHARMA LLC v. Knispel et al
as 0:2022cv61136
Plaintiff:
HYBRID PHARMA LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Knispel, Mark Whitten and Robert Difiore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitten v. Williams, et al
as 22-1180
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES WHITTEN
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Dunn v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv00436
Petitioner:
Michael R Dunn
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whitten v. The Rape Crisis Center Serving Horry and Georgetown Counties Inc et al
as 4:2022cv02010
Plaintiff:
Tracy Whitten
Defendant:
The Rape Crisis Center Serving Horry and Georgetown Counties Inc and Lucy Richards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
WHITTEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08379
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE WHITTEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cortez-Lazcano v. Whitten
as 22-5031
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL CORTEZ-LAZCANO
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK WHITTEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
