Cases 71 - 80 of 180
Douglas v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Leonard Douglas, Sharper Entertainment Inc, LaRouge Entertainment L L C and others
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, City Police of Baton Rouge, Michael Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Kent et al
as 5:2016cv01734
Plaintiff:
Leonard Douglas
Defendant:
Jason Kent, Mike Erwin, Unknown 19th J D C Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore, III v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14940
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore, III
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Robert Levis Chevrolet, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
United States Of America v. Moore, III
as 4:2016mc01834
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Johnnie J. Moore, III
United States Of America v. Moore, III
as 4:2016mc01837
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Johnnie J. Moore, III
McKesson et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2016cv00520
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Carl Dabadie, Jr., East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wayne Erp, Gloria La Riva, Kira Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rater v. RIX Energy Services, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00705
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rater
Defendant:
RIX Energy Services, LLC , JKD Red Dirt Oilfield Services, Inc. , JK Red Dirt Rentals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
North Baton Rouge Matters et al v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 3:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana, Black Youth Project 100, Louisiana Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild and others
Defendant:
Baton Rouge Police Department, City of Baton Rouge, Carl Dabadie, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frankie LordMaster v. Moore
as 16-6880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOORE, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
