Cases 71 - 80 of 258
Flores v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07299
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENDOZA v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03762
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK ANASTACIO MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salazar v. Vanegas International Group LLC et al
as 1:2018cv25143
Plaintiff:
Luis Eduardo Salazar
Defendant:
Anastacio Lorente, Matelo Enterprises, Inc., Monica Vanegas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Crawford v. Best et al
as 1:2018cv04882
Defendant:
Danal Which, Lt. Mr. Givens, C/O Anastacio and others
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palafox v. Spiller et al
as 3:2018cv01155
Plaintiff:
Anastacio B. Palafox
Defendant:
William A. Spiller, Kent E. Brookman, Terrance T. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2018cv00505
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Anastacio Hernandez, William P. McManus and others
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Garcia, Divanne Garcia, Lacey Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Anastacio G. Ramirez v. Scott Frauenheim
as 2:2018cv03628
Respondent:
Scott Frauenheim
Petitioner:
Anastacio G. Ramirez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Acosta
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
