Cases 71 - 80 of 4,557
Dorian O'Kelley v. Warden GDP
as 23-12947
Petitioner / Appellant:
DORIAN FRANK O'KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
ZACK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6123
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Thomas v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv01005
Petitioner:
Steven Alan Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Donald Otis Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Roy L. Ellis
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
(DP) Vieira v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Richard John Vieira
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Hall v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Erick Virgil Hall
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Johnny Johnson v. David Vandergriff
as 23-2664
Petitioner / Appellant:
Johnny A. Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
David Vandergriff, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
