Cases 81 - 90 of 568
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Johanna Nelson
Defendant:
Robert Hill, Elvenia Andrea Barnett and Klutts Property Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
HILL v. CARVANA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HILL
Defendant:
CARVANA, LLC and Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
VALENTINE et al v. TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
JOE VALENTINE and IRENE VALENTINE
Defendant:
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HILL v. WINSTON SALEM FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RON HILL
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE, FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICER ROBERT WYRICK and FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICER KEVIN ALLIGOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03042
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Dennis Daniels, Antonia Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00074
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVID HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Matthew Danny Hill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
KINCAID v. UNC CHAPEL HILL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2021cv00884
Plaintiff:
DONALD KINCAID
Defendant:
UNC CHAPEL HILL HOSPITAL, DR. MS. JANE DOE and NCDPS DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
