Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 840
Tullgren v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00856
Plaintiff: Michael Tullgren
Defendant: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., The Board of Trustees of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan
Amicus Curiae: The ERISA Industry Committee, The American Benefits Council and The American Retirement Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Medley v. XPO Logistics et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff: Shawn Medley
Defendant: XPO Logistics, Administrative Committee of the XPO Benefit Plan, Plan No. 520, Matrix Absence Management and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In re Omnicom Group. Inc. ERISA Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04141
Plaintiff: Surfina Adams, Daniel Dise, Shane Tepper and others
Defendant: John Does 1-30, Administrative Committee, Omnicom Group, Inc., Omnicom Group, Inc. and others
Lead Plaintiff: Carol Maisonette
Consolidated Defendant: Administrative Committee of the Omnicom Group Retirement Savings Plan and Does No. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
PARTIDA v. Schenker Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv09192
Plaintiff: DIEGA PARTIDA
Defendant: Schenker Inc., ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF SCHENKER, INC. 401(K) SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN, JOCHEN THEWES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. Cut and Core Concrete Cutting, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10008
Plaintiff: Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Plumbers Local 98 Defined Contribution Fund, Plumbers Local 98 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant: Mark H. Ward d/b/a Cut and Core Concrete Cutting, LLC, Mark H. Ward and Cut and Core Concrete Cutting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Dionicio et al v. U.S. Bancorp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00026
Plaintiff: Ana L. Dionicio and Alejandro M. Wesaw
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp, Board of Directors of U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp's Benefits Administration Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Appvion, Inc. Retirement Savings and Employee Stoc v. Douglas Buth, et al
as 23-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant: APPVION, INC. RETIREMENT SAVINGS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, by and through Grant Lyon in his capacity as the ESOP Administrative Committee of Appvion, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: DOUGLAS P. BUTH, HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC., STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY and others
Moon v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01856
Defendant: Corteva, Inc., U.S. Dupont Pension And Retirement Plan, The Administrative Committee, Dupont De Nemours, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: M. P. Moon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bloom et al v. AllianceBernstein L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10576
Plaintiff: Donald S. Bloom, David C. Greenfield, Damian L. Smikle and others
Defendant: AllianceBernstein L.P., Compensation and Workplace Practices Committee of AllianceBernstein Corporation, Ramon de Oliveira and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
RAJPUROHIT v. BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv07612
Plaintiff: DAVID S RAJPUROHIT
Defendant: BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY, THE BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY SAVINGS INCENTIVE PLAN N/K/A THE BD 401(K) PLAN, PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE BD 401(K) PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?