Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Evelyn Rodriguez-Baires, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73904
Petitioner:
EVELYN ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ-BAIRES and LUIS ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ-BAIRES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Antonetti v. Neven et al
as 2:2008cv01020
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Defendant:
Dwight Neven, Isidro Bach, James Hensen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Rodriguez-Diaz
as 08-50287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANKLIN ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ
USA v. Rodriguez
as 08-50074
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICIO ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02103
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv03892
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kelly Capital, LLC et al v. Opa-Locka Airport Executive Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv21860
Plaintiff:
Kelly Capital, LLC, Kelly Capital, LLC, First Commercial Corporation and others
Defendant:
Opa-Locka Airport Executive Center, Inc. and Alexander Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Natali et al
as 3:2007cv01264
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Luis Natali, Jane Doe (Wife of Luis Natali), C/P Natali-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Industrial Acceptance Co LP
as 3:2007cv00427
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Industrial Acceptance Co LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
