Cases 81 - 90 of 136
Smith v. State of RI
as 1:2018cv00027
Petitioner:
Andrew Joseph Smith
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Goulart
as 1:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Alan R. Goulart
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dicks v. Armstead et al
as 1:2017cv03691
Petitioner:
Andrew Joseph Dicks
Respondent:
Laura Armstead and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dicks v. Armstead et al
as 1:2017cv03667
Petitioner:
Andrew Joseph Dicks
Respondent:
Laura Armstead and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Smith
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2017cv00480
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Smith
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dicks v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02554
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Dicks
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Jr., Jeff Nines, Jason Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Joseph Hafler et al v. County of San Luis Obispo et al
as 2:2017cv05183
Defendant:
Debbie Arnold, James A. Bergman, Lynn Compton and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nicholaus Gray, Andrew Joseph Hafler, Douglas William Hysell and others
Andrew Joseph, Jr. v. Henry Echenique, et al
as 17-12185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW JOSEPH, JR., as natural father, next friend and personal representative of the Estate of Andrew Joseph, III deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
HENRY ECHENIQUE, in his individual capacity, MARK CLARK, STEPHEN JONES, in his individual capacity and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
