Cases 81 - 90 of 127
Deutsch et al v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02987
Plaintiff:
Steven Deutsch and Diane Deutsch
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Carmax Business Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02964
Plaintiff:
Deanna Brown
Defendant:
Carmax Business Services, LLC, CarMax Auto Superstores Services, Inc., Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Mamedov v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ravshan Mamedov
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. et al v. StarMax Finance, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. and CarMax Business Services, LLC
Defendant:
StarMax Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Speckhardt v. Cunsumer Program Administrators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Henry (Hank) Speckhardt
Defendant:
Consumer Program Administrators, Inc. and Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Frank Smiderle v. CarMax Auto Superstore, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00593
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstore, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Frank Smiderle
Mamedov v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00698
Plaintiff:
Ravshan Mamedov
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
CarMax Auto SuperStores, Inc. v. Ellison
as 3:2014cv00890
Petitioner:
CarMax Auto SuperStores, Inc.
Respondent:
Sylvia Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILING ERROR
as 5:2014cv00868
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erin L Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
