Cases 81 - 90 of 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
United States of America v. Ebertowski et al
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lindsay Jo Ebertowski, CitiFinancial, Inc., ABA Recovery Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00105
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
HINKLE v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02658
Plaintiff:
DAMIENNE HINKLE
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., PENTAGROUP FINANCIAL, LLC and CITIFINANCIAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bank of America, NA v. Jen-Rod Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv11419
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, NA
Defendant:
Jen-Rod Properties, LLC , Stonebridge Associates, LP, Bark Brown I, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bank of America, NA v. Jen-Rod Properties, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv11419
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, NA
Defendant:
Jen-Rod Properties, LLC , Stonebridge Associates, LP, Bark Brown I, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Burnett v. Tax Ease Funding, L P
as 4:2011cv01189
Defendant:
Tax Ease Funding, L P , Greg Leal and CitiFinancial Inc
Plaintiff:
Theresa Burnett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
SHOENFELT v. DRS BONDED COLLECTION SYSTEMS et al
as 3:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
MISTY SHOENFELT
Defendant:
DRS BONDED COLLECTION SYSTEMS and CITIFINANCIAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
United States of America v. Updike et al
as 6:2011cv06103
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jessica Updike, Yates County, a Municipal Corporation, CitiFinancial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lundquist v. CitiFinancial, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Lynda Lundquist
Defendant:
CitiFinancial, Inc , Steve Cannon and John Does (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
