Cases 81 - 90 of 188
Hamilton v. Mental Health Staff at JTVCC
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Hamilton
Defendant:
Mental Health Staff at JTVCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 5:2021cv01097
Defendant:
Hollow Center Packing Co., John Doe (1 through 100), BASF Catalysts LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon and David W. Gordon, Sr.
Cross Claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.F. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals et al v. Sieferman
as 2:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Sherri Franklin, David Gordon, Brian Van Horn and others
Defendant:
Jessica Sieferman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Mountford v. The People
as 20-56283
Respondent / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GORDON MOUNTFORD, AKA David Gordon Mountain
David Mountford v. The People
as 20-55809
Respondent / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GORDON MOUNTFORD, AKA David Gordon Mountain
Oppenheimer v. A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
MOSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00363
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GORDON MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Mountford v. The People of California
as 20-55203
Respondent / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID G. MOUNTFORD and DAVID GORDON MOUNTFORD
David Mountford v. People of the State of CA
as 20-55104
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GORDON MOUNTFORD, AKA David Gordon Mountain
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Charles Gordon v. Joe Lizarraga
as 20-15105
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES DAVID GORDON
Respondent / Appellee:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Warden, Mule Creek State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
