Cases 81 - 90 of 525
Crockett v. Sloan et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
f/n/u Escobar, Lyell Sloan and DCSO Medical Dept. & DCSO Dental
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage v. TN Dept of Correction
as 3:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cage
Defendant:
TN Dept of Correction and Deberry Special Needs Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Fly et al
as 3:2020cv00783
Defendant:
f/n/u Davis, Rutherford County Sheriffs Dept. and f/n/u Fly
Plaintiff:
Sean Earl Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2020cv01172
Defendant:
TN Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Shelby County
as 2:2020cv02434
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Shelby County, Ofc. Baggins and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00512
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe Defendants, Tennessee Dept. of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Jenel Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv02438
Defendant:
Ofc. Johnson, Ofc. Dance, Sgt. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Shelby County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv02389
Plaintiff:
John L. Nash
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff and Shelby County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomson v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Maury County Sheriff Dept., Maury County Jail and David Stewart
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ray Thomson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbertson v. Sullivan County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 2:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Ballad Health, Kingsport City Courts of Sullivan Co. TN, Sullivan County Sheriff's Dept and others
Plaintiff:
James Allen Culbertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
