Cases 81 - 90 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KINCAID v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
SANDRA KINCAID
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Scott et al v. United States Attorney Offices et al
as 1:2018cv00725
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
United States Attorney Offices, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and Freedom of International Act and Privacy Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUNDY v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2018cv00623
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. GUNDY
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ROGERS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2018cv00454
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Plaintiff:
JON R. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Brian Hill v. EOUSA
as 18-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN DAVID HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, EOUSA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DOJ
MANOS et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MANOS, RONNIE MOLINA and JEREMY PINSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
