Cases 81 - 90 of 111
Vieux v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Richard Vieux
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Ray Holt and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv02876
Plaintiff:
Leon West, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Walker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Gary C Walker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John T Rathman, B Alley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iacullo v. United States Department of Justice et al (MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
Dino Iacullo
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Mack v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv03341
Petitioner:
Willie Louis Mack
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00911
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lamont Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Anthony Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2010cv02772
Plaintiff:
Lapictetus Aushaw Coleman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villabona-Alvarado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2010cv01853
Petitioner:
Mario E Villabona-Alvarado
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURCHISON v. BLEDSOE et al
as 1:2010cv01452
Petitioner:
KENNETH MURCHISON
Respondent:
BLEDSOE, Constance Reese, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2010cv01063
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dimitri Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
