Cases 81 - 90 of 296
Perry v. Beltrami County et al
as 0:2019cv02580
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC, Tyler Carraway, Brandon Feldt and others
Plaintiff:
Del Shea Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Nash et al
as 2:2019cv01407
Defendant:
Fredrickson and Jennifer Nash
Plaintiff:
Jason Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson v. Darrow et al
as 4:2019cv04127
Defendant:
Sara L. Darrow, Kevin Knight, Meredith DeCarlo and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy B Fredrickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02290
Plaintiff:
Russell Fredrickson and Connie Fredrickson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Fredrickson v. Simon Jones, et al
as 19-1856
Defendant / Appellee:
SIMON JONES, Lieutenant, THOMAS JANCA, RN and RUSSELL HEISNER, current warden, automatically substituted in place of former warden A. M. Owens
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY B. FREDRICKSON
Fredrickson v. McAwful et al
as 4:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Jermy McAwful, Moline Taskforce and Davenport Taskforce
Plaintiff:
Tim Fredrickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson v. Terrill
as 4:2019cv04080
Petitioner:
Timothy B Fredrickson
Respondent:
Dusty Terrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates et al
as 3:2019cv00455
Defendant:
Richard D. Fairbanks, Capital One, Steven D. Fredrickson and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fredrickson v. McAwful et al
as 4:2019cv04041
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brandon Fredrickson
Defendant:
Jermy McAwful, Moline Taskforce and Davenport Taskforce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Fredrickson v. Metropolitan Correctional Cen, et al
as 19-1333
Defendant / Appellee:
C. WILLIAMS, Lieutenant, A.M. OWENS, Warden, METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY B. FREDRICKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
