Cases
Cases 81 - 88 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00567
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TEVEBAUGH v. THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01177
Defendant: JAMES L. GREESON, BRIAN SANFORD, AL STOVAL and others
Plaintiff: JEREMY TEVEBAUGH
Cause Of Action: O
SCOTT et al v. THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00150
Plaintiff: GLEN C. SCOTT, BRENDA L. BUCCI, LARRY W. BUTTERY and others
Defendant: THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and JAMES L. GREESON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greeson v. Wal-Mart
as 4:2008cv00084
Plaintiff: Cynthia Greeson
Defendant: Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Florez v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2008cv00011
Plaintiff: Armand Florez
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy et al v. City of Woodstaock, Georgia et al
as 1:2007cv02084
Plaintiff: Heather Kennedy, Robert William Griffith, Jr., Deondre Wheeler and others
Defendant: City of Woodstaock, Georgia, Ric Moss, Charles Greeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy et al v. BeauClair et al
as 4:2007cv00042
Plaintiff: Alisha Ann Murphy, Carla Jacobsen, Esther Miller and others
Defendant: Tom BeauClair, Vaughn Killeen, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mandal, et al v. The City of New York, et al
as 1:2002cv01234
Plaintiff: Shreya Mandal, Jacques Aboaf, Brigit Greeson Alvarez and others
Petitioner: William Rashbaum and John Marzulli
Defendant: The City of New York, Bernard Kerik, Howard Safir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?