Cases 81 - 90 of 120
Vazquez-Quiles et al v. Antares Oil Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02070
Plaintiff:
Jose O. Vazquez-Quiles, Nereida Rios-Rios, Darys Y Melecio-Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Antares Oil Services, LLC, Repsol Petroleo, S.A., MAPFRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv03176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cornelius de Mexico S.A. de C.V. v. Vazquez
as 3:2010cv01431
Plaintiff:
IMI Cornelius de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Defendant:
Jose F. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1560
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vargas-Torres, et al v. Toledo, et al
as 10-1114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARLOS VARGAS-TORRES, MIRIAM VARGAS-SEPULVEDA, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP, Vargas-Vargas and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CARBO, JOSE FIGUEROA, CAMILLE ORTIZ-SEPULVEDA and others
Defendant:
JOSE M. ALAGO-FELICIANO, WILLIAM RUIZ, JOSE TORRES-VAZQUEZ and others
VAZQUEZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34411
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez v. Corwin et al
as 2:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Vazquez
Defendant:
Kevin Corwin, Julia Menteer, Steven Zike and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Vazquez-Castro
as 09-2109
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-CASTRO
US v. Vazquez-Castro
as 09-2108
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-CASTRO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
