Cases 81 - 90 of 162
James Wright v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 17-3152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MICHAEL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
RAMBERT v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, C. CARTER, D. DICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. CARSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY WETZEL, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, EISENBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lindner et al v. Roti Restaurants, LLC
as 1:2017cv00935
Plaintiff:
Lindner, Cooper Lindner and Kim Smith
Defendant:
Roti Restaurants, LLC and Roti Restaurants, LLC A Delaware limited liablility company doing business as Roti Modern Mediterranean and Roti Mediterranean Grill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
ALKHATB v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00313
Petitioner:
AMIR ALKHATB
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and KIM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, SARAH SIEGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
ANIBAL ROMAN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2016cv17162
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Rambert v. Jamie Ferkdarko, et al
as 16-4275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE FERKDARKO, RNS, LISA ZUPSIC, ND.C, GARY PRINKEY, RNS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
