Cases 81 - 90 of 499
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00389
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. KING and SANDRA KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING-MARLOW v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
ANNIE KING-MARLOW
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CLARK v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2019cv04180
Defendant:
Jeffrey Davis, Kings Express, Inc., Allen Furrer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Intervenor:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHENIX INVESTIGATIONS, INC. v. PCS WIRELESS, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04241
Defendant:
PINCHUS BENYAHUDA, SCHENCK PRICE SMITH & KING, LLP, PCS WIRELESS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHENIX INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RONDEAU v. HEDDEN et al
as 1:2019cv04018
Plaintiff:
C. RONDEAU
Defendant:
K. HEDDEN, M. KING and WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YANANTA v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv03928
Plaintiff:
ISI CHITO LUSA YANANTA, WASTEUH MEHERRIN NATION and HAKEEM SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHARLES KING, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
RANSOM v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv04266
Defendant:
MAJOR FOX, LYNETTE KING, I. RANDOLPH and others
Plaintiff:
MARK RANSOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03895
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JERRY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
