Cases 81 - 90 of 528
Donald Lankford v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, et al
as 21-3269
Defendant / Appellee:
SONNY PERDUE, JOHN RICHARD SHREWSBERRY, MONTGOMERY, OH COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD K. LANKFORD
Christopher Lankford v. City of Plummerville, Arkansas, et al
as 21-1639
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Plummerville, Arkansas and Albert Duvall, Individually
Defendant:
Conway County, Arkansas
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Lankford
LANKFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06973
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOE LANKFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goss v. Jackie Bird, et al
as 7:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Elbert Cassay, Jackie Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Micheal Goss, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keitt v. Lankford et al
as 1:2021cv00344
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc., Barry Keith Lankford and Arcbest II, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Byron Keitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rotish Singh v. Sue Washburn, et al
as 21-35032
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CLARKE, Food Service Coordinator, S. SHELTON, Medical Director, A. SMITH, Physical Plant Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROTISH VIKASH SINGH
Lankford v. McCarthy
as 9:2021cv00022
Petitioner:
Timothy Lankford
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lankford v. Dixon Correctional Center
as 1:2020cv06963
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Lankford
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Dixon Correctional Center
as 4:2020cv04239
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Lankford
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
