Cases 81 - 90 of 296
Ellis v. Ross et al
as 1:2019cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Michael Ross, Garrison Law Firm, Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. J.E.A.N. Team Task Force et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
Polcie officer, Garrison Law Firm, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GARRIGUS v. CODILIS LAW, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv01999
Defendant:
FAY SERVICING, LLC, CODILIS LAW, LLC, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI GARRIGUS and TERRI L. GARRIGUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SAVAGE v. HENDRICK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv01965
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CELM JOSEPH SAVAGE
Defendant:
HENDRICK COUNTY JAIL, DANIEL MAXWELL, JOSEPH LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman et al v. Marinosci Law Group P C et al
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Gary Marinosci and Marinosci Law Group, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Phillip A Norman, Phillip A. Norman, P.C. Attorneys f/k/a Phillip A. Norman, Attorney, Professional Corporation, Desert Streams, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Gerald Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stone v. Whitt
as 3:2018cv00962
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Ron Whitt, Indiana Law Enforcement Academy, Town of New Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
