Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
LEWIS v. CABANA COACHES
as 1:2012cv20783
Plaintiff:
MARY LEWIS
Defendant:
CABANA COACHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Bechtel National, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
Amanda Anderson , Brenda Anderson , Sandra Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , Tawanda Jackson , Bernadette Landry and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , All Plaintiffs , Tawanda Jackson and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Bechtel National, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Amanda Anderson , All Plaintiffs , Brenda Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOP et al v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv06697
Plaintiff:
SIMON SOP and MARIE LEWIS SOP
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and DAEWOOD ELECTRONICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Diane Marie Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEWIS v. CABANA COACHES
as 2:2011cv02507
Plaintiff:
MARY LEWIS
Defendant:
CABANA COACHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mary Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
