Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Mead v. Gaston County Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Mead
Defendant:
Gaston County Police Department , North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations , William J. Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mead v. Gaston County Police Department et al
as 0:2011cv03017
Plaintiff:
Michael Mead
Defendant:
Gaston County Police Department, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations, William J Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Litmon, Jr. v. Santa Clara County Board of Su, et al
as 11-15996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LITMON, Jr.
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and JAMES BABCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD FLORES, Chief of the Santa Clara County Department of Corrections, DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Lieutenant, MITCHELL CONNER, Classification Sergeant and others
Joseph v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv00317
Petitioner:
Mario Joseph
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , M.J. Moore , Kim Boulia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv00184
Petitioner:
Mario Joseph
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., M. J. Moore, Kim Boulia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv20467
Petitioner:
Mario Joseph
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , M.J. Moore , Kim Boulia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv00118
Petitioner:
Mario Joseph
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., M.J. Moore, Kim Boulia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mead v. Mead
as 3:2011cv00012
Defendant:
Sean Michael Mead
Plaintiff:
Stacy Ann Mead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv24269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
