Cases 81 - 90 of 14,292
DERRICK et al v. GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS et al
as 2:2019cv01541
Plaintiff:
DERRICK, WALTER, THOMAS and others
Defendant:
RANDY IRESON, CHESTER COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. THE GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS et al
as 2:2019cv01292
Plaintiff:
MOTHER MILLER
Defendant:
THE GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS and JOHN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MILLS v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00265
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELLS v. DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00867
Defendant:
DAYS INN BY WYNDHAM ELMSFORD, DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC., WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JENISE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLEPACH v. ARDENT MILLS, LLC
as 5:2019cv00574
Defendant:
ARDENT MILLS, LLC
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KLEPACHI and EDWARD KLEPACH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FENNELL et al v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERKLEY, KENNETH SERNOBLE, GABRIEL LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GOLDY, LIEUTENANT HENNINGER, CAPTAIN MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUFFALO GROVE POLICE PENSION FUND v. DIEFENDERFER et al
as 2:2019cv00062
Defendant:
JANE J THOMPSON, WILLIAM M DIEFENDERFER, III, SOMSAK CHIVAVIBAL and others
Nominal Defendant:
NAVIENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BUFFALO GROVE POLICE PENSION FUND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv05553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mills v. Ebbert
as 1:2018cv02368
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Petitioner:
Eddie Jerome Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
