Cases 81 - 90 of 496
Marshall v. USA
as 1:2019cv00640
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randy Laverne Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hubbert v. Turner et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Defendant:
COTV, Marshal Turner, Lt. Ecko Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hubbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Marshall County, Mississippi et al v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00190
Plaintiff:
Marshall County, Mississippi, Sheriff Kenny Dickerson and John Does 1-5
Defendant:
Jane/John Does 1-5, Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and Corporations/Companies 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Turner
as 1:2019cv00157
Petitioner:
Joey Chandler
Respondent:
Marshal Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00496
Plaintiff:
Marshall David Gregory
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lafleur v. Harrison County et al
as 1:2019cv00437
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Services, Troy Peterson and Harrison County
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph Lafleur
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Turner
as 2:2019cv00109
Plaintiff:
Glen Payton
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Superintendent Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2019cv00407
Plaintiff:
Torey C. Smith
Defendant:
President Donald Trump, United States Marshals Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Turner
as 3:2019cv00409
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Marshal Unknown Turner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Callahan v. Ce'zar, et al
as 1:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Jousha Ce'zar, Mississippi Dept. Corr., S. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Callahan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
