Cases 81 - 90 of 171
Moore v. Warden
as 2:2014cv00055
Petitioner:
Roger Moore
Respondent:
Anne Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02069
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carter and Mary Carter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mizell E. Ewing, III v. Ann Mary Carter
as 14-6654
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIZELL E. EWING, III
Respondent - Appellee:
ANN MARY CARTER, Warden
Respondent:
UNIT TEAM, MS. VELTRI, Case Manager Coordinator, C. EICHENLAUB, Regional Director of Mid-Atlantic and others
PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMENS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00335
Defendant:
MARK C. CARTER , MARY CARTER , FIBER COMPOSITES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMENS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Briscoe v. Carter
as 5:2014cv00040
Petitioner:
Carl Briscoe
Respondent:
Anne Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. BSA-38108 v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2014cv01288
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. BSA-38108
Defendant:
PAUL T. YOUNG, BRENDA HOLMES, MARY CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Carter
as 3:2014cv00003
Petitioner:
Antoine Depaul Marshall
Respondent:
Anne Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griggs v. Carter
as 5:2013cv00164
Petitioner:
David M. Griggs
Respondent:
Anne Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Carter
as 1:2013cv00216
Petitioner:
Roger Moore
Respondent:
Anne Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ewing v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Petitioner:
Mizell E. Ewing, III
Respondent:
Veltri, Ann Mary Carter, General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
