Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Kelly v. Merrell Footware Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Stephen Patrick Kelly
Defendant:
Merrell Footware Inc. and Yellowstone Sports Retailer, L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sherrod v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sherrod
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, C Howard, Unknown Behle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Merrell v. Swift Transportation Co. Arizona, LLC
as 3:2023cv05013
Plaintiff:
Charles Merrell
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Stone et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv13861
Plaintiff:
Merrell Stone and Kittie Noll
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Neal Walker
as 23-10482
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NEAL MERRELL WALKER
USA v. Merrell Hobbs
as 23-1046
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MERRELL HOBBS, a/k/a "Rel", a/k/a "Murder"
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrell v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Carol Lynn Merrell
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morris Sr. v. Huffman
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
Mary K. Huffman, David Merrell, Christopher Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAKER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2022cv02765
Plaintiff:
NAMIG BAKER, IRINA GORODNITSKY,, GLENN BAKER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
